Ben Jealous, the President of the NAACP announced that the oldest Civil Rights organization in the country was coming out in support of gay marriage. I’m asking a few simple questions to my Right-Wing friends.

I’ll start with this, but I have a few not-so-rhetorical questions in this column. Here we go:

What if somebody told your parents that they weren’t allowed to get married? What if they couldn’t get married because your mom was black and your dad was white? What if mom was German and dad was Italian? I am by NO means a supporter of the institution of marriage, but this got me choked up:

Chances are, you really can’t imagine somebody telling you that you aren’t entitled to love who you love – but that’s what gay rights are really all about. It’s not political, it’s not religious – it’s just about doing what is right. Sometimes I don’t agree with what I know in my heart is the right or fair thing to do, but I do it anyway. My dad taught me that was character, and it’s a good thing.


Mitt Romney was the Governor of Massachusetts, right? He has actual executive experience in government. Why is it that the heart of his campaign is his time as a private businessman, and not his actual record as the executive of a state?

The answer – Mass. was 47th in the country in “job creation” when Romney was Governor. So when he talks about creating jobs while a private businessman at Bain Capital, and how that makes him qualified to lead the country the simple question I ask is: Why did that Bain Capital experience not lead to insane job growth in Massachusetts when you were in charge?


So the Catholic church is suing over women taking birth control. Is anyone else worried about the new trend in rolling back rights for Americans? The foundation of the Constitution is in expanding the rights of the people, not constricting them. Why is the Catholic church so out of step with the will of its parishioners – the majority of whom use contraception?

The bigger question is why religious people pick and choose what parts of the Bible should be taken as literal law and which parts can be ignored. I can’t think of a greater example of Republican and religious hypocrisy than to see guys like Rush Limbaugh and Newt Gingrich talk about how marriage should always be between one man, and one woman only.

Rush is on his 4th wife, and Newt on his 3rd, and the Catholic church also speaks out against divorce…


I guess I don’t understand why people aren’t called out on their bullshit more often. In relationships, in politics, in religion… Can anyone keep it real anymore?

God says to love everyone… Unless they think differently – Then they must die.

The Triple S Duality

Posted: May 21, 2012 in Relationships
Tags: ,

“A man needs a wife, a mistress, and a maid. The trick is finding one woman who can be all three” – Spiffy Sean Styles

I had the weekend off from shows because my guitar player got married (And congrats Kenny) so I tried to be a “normal” guy. I failed miserably. My problem is that my “work” persona has consumed my public life to the point where I feel social anxiety and general uncomfortableness when I’m at a bar or club and I’m not performing. It’s kind of a sad side-effect of success. I don’t think my business would be doing so well if I wasn’t so focused on things, and being a “normal” guy at a bar just hasn’t appealed to me. It’s a lot of different things, but it just feels like WORK when I’m at a place where my band plays. I’m just not used to it anymore. I’m not used to not being on stage. I’m not used to having to actually pay for drinks. I’m not used to approaching people who don’t know me as the guy performing.

I don’t know if I feel bad about all of this. Honestly, I stared Walk of Shame because after I graduated from college and left my Fraternity I was worried that I’d end up like Brian Wilson and never leave my house again. The band offered me an outlet to get out of the house, have a bit of fun and ended up being a pretty successful thing.

I do great in one-on-one settings, where I feel completely “off the clock” and I can be myself. the problem is I generally don’t put myself out there anymore. In reference to the above quote: Girls who get upset over that can calm the fuck right down. Girls who lash out over a quote like that don’t GET IT, and probably never will. I posted that on Facebook and heard “Oh, I bet you are single” as if having a rational position about men needing/wanting women to be multi-dimensional somehow points to me being a misogynist.

1) You don’t look like her and 2) If you did, you wouldn’t fuck me, anyway.

Ladies here’s a hint: You know how to identify the guys who aren’t looking? We are the ones who aren’t kissing your ass anymore. You want to find the single guys? Look on your attention-whore riddled Facebook for who is commenting on your latest duckface picture with your tits hanging out. Read who is commenting when you make some bullshit post like, “It’s cold I wish I had a good man to cuddle with” – THOSE guys are single. THOSE guys are looking – Not the guy who is honest and doesn’t give a shit about catering to your ego, saying what they are SUPPOSED to say, and doesn’t care about impressing you.

No, I didn’t notice your new shoes.

No, I don’t give a shit about your new purse.

No, I could care less that you got your hair done.

You know why? I’m not TRYING.

Maybe that’s why I like girls at my shows. They don’t want to talk to me about their day. They know I don’t care about the new dress they are wearing – They are happy looking and feeling good, and they know that at the bar there are 40 guys who are more than happy to tell them how hot they look.

I’m just not that guy anymore… And I’m starting to be ok with that.

EDIT – Adding this based on the girls on facebook flaming me:

Happy Belated Mother’s Day to all of the moms out there. I had a stroke of scheduling luck when my band Walk of Shame was playing last weekend down at the university of Maryland and I was able to head up to Bel Air and see Mom on Sunday.

I was also pleasantly surprised that my little sister was down there along with my niece and nephew. As someone with a degree in psychology it is always fun for me to observe the changes in the way that I can interact with the kids. We decided a couple of years ago that my niece doesn’t like me very much, and that it probably has to do with me being a lot bigger and louder than most of the people she knows. I’ve been working on “baby steps” with her, and the progress is slow, but noticeable. I have a feeling she’s going to be SUPER smart when she gets a bit older, and as soon as she realizes that her Uncle Sean is brilliant – we are going to get along great. Of course there is always the possibility that like most people, she won’t understand my genius lol.


“You are entitled to your own beliefs. You are entitled to your own opinions. You are NOT entitled to your own facts.” – Ricky Gervais

I like talking to people who have different perspectives than I do because it often helps me understand my fellow man a lot better. I had that experience this past weekend when sitting outside talking with my mom and sister after dinner. Religion has a lot more influence on their lives that it has ever had for me, so it is a generally good rule of thumb to avoid topics of conversation where there are fundamental differences of opinion.

Maryland is actually putting gay rights on the ballot in November. The problem is that gay rights are MINORITY rights, and the MAJORITY generally isn’t that concerned with them. In fact, same-sex rights have been put on the ballot across the United States 34 times and 33 of those times, it has been voted down.

Here’s the thing about rights – They are not actually supposed to be something that should be voted on. that’s why they are called RIGHTS.

The most ironic opponent to gay Civil Rights? Black people. Apparently most blacks in America can’t think back to a time just 50 years ago when they were fighting for the same equal treatment that LGBT Americans currently battle for.

The comically ironic biggest persecutors of gay people? Christians. You know, the people who left Europe to … Oh yeah, escape persecution for having a different set of beliefs. God Bless America indeed.

“Forgive them, Father. These faggots know not what they do.”

Here’s the cool thing that I learned from my sister: For many religious people the problem isn’t gay people having rights – it is with the actual word “marriage”. To them, marriage has come to be known as a religious ceremony and despite Jesus never saying a single word about teh gay in the Bible (there are mentions in the Old Testament but shockingly, Jewish people don’t seem to be that quick to cast stones generally speaking) they view it as an abomination. She said a Civil Union that would allow for equal LEGAL rights she has no issue with at all – just “gay marriage”.

Did you know that marriage has traditionally been a secular event? In early times men and women simply pooled their resources based on what couples would most likely have children who would survive. That lasted for several thousand years. These relationships were often not monogamous, and would usually only last about 3-4 years before the man would wonder off to start another family. (Coincidentally I’m sure – the average length of marriage is about 3-4 years today.)

… Keep in mind I’m talking about a timeframe of about 1 million years so if you believe that humans rode dinosaurs or that we’ve only been here for 6,000 years – I’d like to direct you to my quote from Ricky Gervais.

Around 20,000 years ago humans began making advances in agriculture and farming that made people less nomadic and more stable. The invention of the plow around 4,000 years ago changed the nature of marriage: Now it was a matter of what households could be the most productive where people were married. This is the era in which marriage became the union between two people that was recognized by their community. Agriculture tied people to their land, meaning that at the end of the four-year period neither men nor women had any inclination to wander off to find a new family. And so they stayed together and worked as a unit to feed and care for the children they produced. The creation of marriage as a legal contract between men and women came into being over time as communities settled on what was a “normal” way for them to organize a family and then codified that normalcy into law.

For example, if it was the norm within the group that men and women were responsible for feeding and caring for their own children. Then laws were created that gave men some assurance that the children they were raising were their own and women some assurance that their husband would not leave them all destitute. Hilary Clinton wrote a book called “It Takes a Village” that draws on many of the community-based initiatives that used to exist in culture that have disappeared.

Now – If you want to go by what The Bible says about marriage, I am all for it. That is mostly because The Bible has no issue with taking multiple wives, women were regarded as little more than property, and a man could have concubines as well. (Jacob married two sisters, Leah and Rachel, and Solomon had 700 wives and 300 concubines.) Divorce was not encouraged, but permitted if a man found some “uncleanness” in his wife. In such a case, he simply wrote her a bill of divorce and sent her out of his house (Deuteronomy 24:1). However, it was virtually impossible for a wife to divorce her husband. Hell, if my brother dies, The Bible says I’m supposed to marry his widow!

The Protestant Reformation of the 16th century rejected the prevailing concept of marriage along with many other Catholic doctrines. Martin Luther declared marriage to be “a worldly thing . . . that belongs to the realm of government”, and a similar opinion was expressed by Calvin. The English Puritans in the 17th century even passed an Act of Parliament asserting “marriage to be no sacrament” and soon thereafter made marriage purely secular. It was no longer to be performed by a minister, but by a justice of the peace.

Hey! I can quote The Bible too! Who decides which verses to ignore?

I really hope this helps give a bit of an education as to the origins of marriage, and why I believe God really doesn’t care who you are with, as long as you are a good person. Do unto others as you would have done (you know, you probably wouldn’t like it if someone else told you that you weren’t allowed to be with who YOU loved, eh?) and that we should all love our neighbor.

I don’t remember Jesus being so hateful and judgmental in The Bible but then again, I sadly probably know more about The Bible than most people who identify themselves as Christians.

Isn’t this worse than just letting gay people marry other consenting adults?

And quite frankly – Over 50% of marriages end in divorce, so if your argument is that allowing same-sex couples to give it the ol’ college try is going to destroy the “sanctity of marriage” – you should probably be pretty pissed about all of the stones that are thrown at your straight glass house. Is there anything more funny than a guy like Rush Limbaugh (on his 4th wife) or Newt Gingrich (On his 3rd) talking about marriage only being between one man or one woman? At least there is no hypocrisy in religion.

… However God can be a sarcastic prick at times.

God Bless,
SSS

I haven’t written in a while, so this is going to be a kind of hodgepodge of things. I appreciate the people who have actually been asking for new ramblings. It’s nice to be missed.


Does it make me a bad person to silently laugh to myself when I see a formerly hot girl who has let herself go? Yes, you were a smoking hot DZ when you were 18… But then there was the freshman 15, the sophomore 15, the junior 15, the senior 15, the grad school 15, etc. Hey whatever – I’ve always been a big guy and it hasn’t hurt me at all with the fairer sex. Double standard indeed.

Fat Chicks Need Love, too – But They Gotta PAY!


I had an actual night off a couple weeks ago and used it to go down to the Meadows and check out the band that was playing. They were called “Groove Buffet” which is an awesome band name for a variety/big band act. They were really good. I saw some things that they did really well, and some things that I can steal. I’m sorry – I forgot that I’m talking about music, so it’s not stealing. Let’s just say there are some ideas and concepts that will “inspire” me to do some different things.

I don’t get the opportunity to check out the “competition” that much. I put “competition” in quotes because I’ve always subscribed to the philosophy that talented musicians should be helping each other, not competing. Quite frankly if I am helping other good bands find solid work, the entire industry is elevated, which leads to bigger and better gigs for me as well. I’ve never understood the “My band is better so we are going to take your gig” attitude that a lot of performers have. I’m sure it’s rooted in insecurity, envy, and jealousy – but as a wise man once said: Haters gonna hate, yo.

I don’t even know you, but I hate you. I hate your guts. I hope all the bad things in life happen to you, and only you.


Dear North Carolina,

I want to thank you for passing a law to make it double-extra illegal for those faggots to get married. Since more than 1/2 of “traditional” marriages end in divorce it’s important to protect the sanctity of the institution. While you are at it, can you pass some legislation to keep these niggers from voting or taking our white women?

Sincerely,

Guy From 1960 who Hijacked Sean’s Column

————

I hope that one day I find my soulmate and together we can share our love by denying others the right to love who THEY want. Oh wait…

Here’s the fun part – The law that passed in North Carolina also denies rights to “traditional” couples who aren’t married. So – domestic partnerships, civil unions – no more rights: Even if you are a Jesus-loving, God-Fearing man and woman. At least people in loving, committed relationships have equal rights in North Carolina now: None.

Our vote counts the EXACT same as YOUR vote counts. Sleep tight, America.

PS – If you are offended by the language in my rhetoric – you should be more offended that you probably know someone who doesn’t have the same rights in this country based solely on who they love.


Can one of my religious friends tell me where Jesus said anything about marriage, or that homosexuality is wrong in the Bible? I’m being serious, because outside of a few references in the Old Testament, I can’t find anything at all.

Now… can one of my smart friends show me in the Constitution where religious ceremonies or religion in general should be governed by the state? No? Can you show me where there is anything mentioned about maybe religion and government being separate? Anything vague would work – I’m open to interpretation.

I find some sort of obligation in being the “privileged” class in America: I’m a straight white male. It doesn’t get much higher on the food chain than that. Anyway, I feel a sense of duty in speaking for those who are not as lucky as I am. I’m not the prototypical “activist” by any stretch, yet it seems that lately I am defending women and homosexuals A LOT.

Do you think people in the 60′s would have voted yes on a referendum for equal rights for blacks? It took The Civil Rights Act of 1964 to jumpstart what remains a modern-day struggle towards equality for blacks in America. If we let the “people” vote on it, I bet there are places like Mississippi where black people would STILL be segregated. We trust these people to do the right thing?

Ask Jackie Robinson all about his struggle for equal treatment. Well don’t, because he’s dead – but if he wasn’t he’d probably tell you that if it wasn’t for Jim Crow laws and pressure to integrate the owners would have continued to resist letting black players play. Doing the “right” thing wasn’t as important as the owners making money: They often rented the stadium out to the Negro League teams when the “white” team was on the road – increasing revenue. Here is an amazing speech given by Dodgers owner Branch Rickey talking about his decision to integrate in 1947.

Why not let people in Arkansas vote on if black people should be allowed to marry outside their race? (By the way, North Carolina finally passed that legislation in 1977) Why not let Texans vote on if Mexicans can come in and work, or even vote? When we as a nation rely on the majority to decide the fate of the minority – our democracy crumbles. When a guy like Chris Christie vetoes a bill that was passed by elected representatives of “The People” because he wants to let the people vote directly on the issue – what is the point of having a democratic society where citizens pick representatives to speak on the Will of the People?

Sometimes doing what is RIGHT is not doing what is POPULAR. Remember that, kids.

Anyone think about KONY or Trayvon Martin in the past month?

It’s good to be back. I appreciate your comments,

SSS

Living The Dream

Posted: April 15, 2012 in Music
Tags: , , ,

I’ve talked about the duality between “Spiffy” and “Sean” in the past, and I think last night gave me a moment of Jager-fueled clarity. Yeah, this column is about me.


Recently I’ve been talking a lot about how the perception can be spun to suit the situation. If a TV station wants higher ratings, they lead with the story that they know appeals to the widest demographic – sometimes even if it has to be sensationalized and almost manufactured not in the vein of journalistic integrity, but instead with money and ratings as the motivating factor.

Which of these guys would you rather date your daughter:

1 – A business owner working on a PhD who owns his house, has a nice car, and comes from a good family?

2 – Some guy in a band who spends his weekends sweaty, fat, drunk, and stupid dancing on top of bars and chugging entire bottles of Jager?

… What if they were the same guy?

A lot of people aren’t comfortable with the fact that I don’t have a “real” job. To them, a “real” job means something that you have to show up every day for, on a schedule, with a boss, and wearing pants.

I just decided that none of that interests me.

“You’ll never become the man if you are working for the man.” – SSS


Playmakers last night

Playmakers last night

People often ask me why I do what I do, and last night it kind of all came together for me. First off, I had one of the most fun weekends of shows that I’ve had in the 4 years that Walk of Shame has been playing music. The vibe is good, the shows have been getting increasingly tight, and the response is where it should be for the level of talent that I’m surrounded by.

So last night at our show in Butler, there were a bunch of Army guys there. They were in town for some drill work before going back out on another tour of duty. I’m the kind of faggot who gets teary-eyed at the Star Spangled Banner, or when the announce returning servicemen at the Pens games.

Anyway, after the show this guy comes up to me. He shakes my hand, and compliments the band on the show. He then says the following to me:

“I just got back from the desert. This is the first time in a year that I’ve felt alive. Thanks man.”

I’m now the kind of faggot who gets teary-eyed while writing a column about the serviceman who validated his entire music career in one sentence.

I like my job. It’s fun, it’s good money, and with the guys I’m playing with right now it’s also amazing art. I never really looked at a bunch of guys getting together to play cover songs as art – but now I do. Most people in my field don’t take their job seriously – but I do. Is it selling myself short to “waste” 10 years of education and tens of thousands of dollars in tuition to get drunk and sing “Jessie’s Girl” every week? Some people would say it is.

I’d say that music makes people feel alive – I don’t think I could be doing anything more important.

Have fun at your “real” job.

It’s Just Not There

Posted: April 12, 2012 in Politics
Tags: , , , ,

Just a quick note before I head to the doctor – I’m still battling this sinus infection, and I have three nights of singing ahead of me.

First off – This weekend marks the four year birthday for Walk of Shame. From playing for $200 bucks and 2 pitchers of beer in dive bars to being asked to play some of the best venues across the country, it’s been a fun ride. I’ve learned a lot, I’ll continue to learn, and my mission statement is to make today better than yesterday. In life – that’s really all you need to keep focusing on.

Make today better than yesterday.

Follow me on twitter – @Walkofshameband

That’s it for shameless self-promotion.


Justice for Trayvon Martin


Just a really simple question to ask everyone: Now that George Zimmerman has been arrested, are you happy? What do you consider “justice”? If George Zimmerman goes to trial for 2nd degree murder and is found not guilty by a jury of his peers, will justice have been served?

Or is “justice” just something that people are substituting for “gets what WE feel he deserves.”?

I saw this during the Casey Anthony trial, where Nancy Grace and other windbags tried the court in the media instead of where it belonged: In a court of law. People were OUTRAGED when she was found innocent, largely because the Court of Public Opinion had already convicted her.

So what is going to happen when George Zimmerman is acquitted?

People are going to outraged. People will riot. There will be violence. There will be destruction. There will be more pain, more suffering, maybe even more people killed in the process.

Will that be justice? Will that satisfy people?

Do you think the people calling for justice will feel responsible? Do you think Al Sharpton is going to feel responsible for the millions of dollars of property damage that will result from this circus?

But hey – The media will have another story to cover, and after all – the ratings are more important than justice.

Follow me on twitter @No_Limit_Nigga

I learned that when women say “I just want a guy to be honest with me” what that REALLY means is “I just want a guy to tell me what I want to hear.” If you ever wondered if I was “that guy” – this column should help clear it up.

I want a steak, a blowjob, no games, no bullshit. Oh, and I really really really wanna zigazig ah.


I’ve always been a pretty free thinker. I’ve always been a pretty free speaker. For better or worse (and typically worse) there generally is never a question about where I stand with things. I’m not shy about voicing my opinion, and I don’t pull punches. There area a lot of people who appreciate and respect that – I’ve turned into a kind of straight-shooting therapist for them.

There are a lot of people who just don’t get it.

Part of being a free-thinker means that by default I am also non-conformist in a lot of my positions. I don’t subscribe to labels, I don’t do what “society” tells me to do. I don’t say what I’m supposed to say.

The place where that platform manifests itself the most is when I am talking to a woman.

Here’s the thing that I’ve learned: Women don’t want you to be honest. Women want the fantasy. Women need to be lied to because it allows them to play the victim/fool when things go wrong. It gives women an out – a lack of accountability. It’s similar to the popular “well, I was drunk” excuse. That guy lied to you? Oh, you poor girl.

It’s the “does my ass look big in this jeans” argument. Things have gotten to the point in Western society where this isn’t even a real question. This is really just a woman seeking positive reinforcement and validation for her looks. What that means to a guy? We are SUPPOSED to answer with some variety of, “No baby, you look amazing.”

… But what if her ass really DOES look big in those jeans?

That’s my problem. I’m a dumb enough motherfucker that I give women the respect and courtesy of an honest answer.

“Hey, do you think my younger sister who is a model is hotter than me?”

“If I told you that I didn’t want to sleep with you, would that change things between us?”

I remember a girl who basically asked me the above question. My answer was, “Well, I could lie to you and say that it wouldn’t change a thing. Or, I could NOT insult your intelligence and say OF COURSE it would change the nature of our relationship.”

Her response was to basically break things off with me.

Seriously?

So because I didn’t essentially lie to her (which obviously is what she wanted) it destroyed the relationship. How’s THAT for a good lesson, guys? Is it that women are so used to being misled about a man’s intentions that they don’t know how to accept a genuine answer? Is it that women NEED a guy to pretend like he just wants to be buddies with them, despite the fact that NO MAN IN THE HISTORY OF THE WORLD has EVER wanted to be “just friends” with a woman. I’ve said it before, and I’m sorry – but since we are being honest and all…

I’m a big fan of compromise, but I refuse to pretend to be somebody that I’m not. Some people appreciate that, and some people are scared away. The bottom line is that I am very comfortable with who I am at this point in my life, and I’m unwilling to jump through hoops for ANYONE.

Just be yourself.

Women are going to make the greatest strides for equality when they realize that there are just certain bullshit things that men do that they shouldn’t WANT to be involved in.

This column will piss women off, and have several references to Caddyshack. I think I should get a free pass because of my strong defense of women’s reproductive rights, abortion, and overall gender equality. I love women. After all, this laundry isn’t going to wash itself! BOOYAH!

There are people (when I say people, I mean women) who are up in arms… AGAIN… over Augusta National not allowing women to become members. The simple response is, “Hey, it’s a private club. Fuck right off and make me a sammich.” The club is one of the most exclusive and secretive in the world, and happens to host one of the biggest golf tournaments of the year as well. The Masters is relevant again this year because Tiger Woods looks like he is going to not suck for the first time since his wife took a 9-iron to his face for banging half of the cute white women in Florida.

Stop it. Women are not equal. Women complain that they make 30% less in the workplace, claiming that it is a product of gender bias. In reality, it really is that women are not as aggressive during salary negotiations so they end up doing the same job for less money despite being equally qualified to a male counterpart. If I run a company and you are WILLING to do the same job for $35,000 that I would have to pay a man $50,000 for – That’s on you. I’ve said it before and in the words of the Immortal Hulk Hogan, “Everyone cuts their own deal, brother.”

Why do women WANT to go where they aren’t wanted? We aren’t talking about not being able to drink from the same water fountains – We are talking about a handful of PRIVATE establishments that have the right to admit whomever they want. If women were truly trying to be equal, they’d start their OWN club, and then not let men in. Guess how many men would complain about that? Go ahead, guess.

Look, I’ve belonged to country clubs, and women are annoying. First off, they are generally shitty golfers. They hit the ball 50 yards at a time, slow down the entire course, and screw up not just their group, but the next five groups behind them who now have to wait for Muriel to find her ball that she duffed into the bush off the fairway. No, that is not a double entendre, but it fucking should be. Second off, let’s stop all of the overly politically correct bullshit. I know, politicians have to condemn The Masters for being exclusionary. Let me ask you this: Do you think Mitt Romney REALLY wants women to be admitted to Augusta? Mitt Romney is EXACTLY the guy hanging out in the clubhouse there. Women – you want to hang with Mitt?


You know who gets it? Strippers. Men are stupid, slobbering idiots who are easily distracted by boobs and shiny objects. If you want power, exploit that. Get paid – then join your own damn country club where you and a bunch of hot stripper friends can get mani/pedi’s and laugh about all of the money you’ve milked out of unsuspecting middle-aged men while you sip margarita’s by the pool. If you want to make out, maybe have some sort of poolside pillow fight with your friends, that’s fine too. I’ll just be over here… Sitting quietly and not interrupting. Unless you need me for anything, that is…

MEN did not invent human resources. if women weren’t working, there wouldn’t be any problems at all. Now women are in the workplace, and DON’T YOU DARE stare at her low-cut blouse, because it could now cost you your entire career. It’s a byproduct of the whole women in the workplace thing, and it stinks. Women are just as guilty (if not moreso) of flirting in the office, causing drama, breaking up marriages, and when things don’t go their way it’s easy to run to HR and cause a bigger problem. That’s not power – That’s a bitch move.

I’m not saying that women should be objectified in the workplace, or be inappropriately touched or groped. What I’m saying is Tom Brady rules:


Ladies – Pick your battles. Why do you want to go hang out with a bunch of gross old white guys? I’m a pretty progressive guy, and generally very socially liberal. I HATE all of the ways that groups segregate themselves in this society right now. If you want to claim that the Trayvon Martin case is racially motivated, I can accept that position. I’d give a LOT more credibility if EVERY SINGLE advocate for the case coincidentally wasn’t black. I’ve made this case before: I’m one of the best advocates for gay and lesbian rights around, and it is because I am a straight man. Of COURSE black people have to speak out on the Trayvon Martin case. Let’s not forget that black people also spoke out supporting OJ Simpson when he ALLEGEDLY killed his wife. Michael Jackson is a creepy pedophile? No way man, he made “Thriller”.


That’s my Robert. Always peeing on people. Don’t forget her hair!

I don’t want to get off on a tangent here, but the point is that SOME exclusion is good. Let the creepy white guys have their club. If you want equal rights as women, you have to act like you don’t give a shit about being left out of a private event. I’m not pissed off that girls won’t respond to my e-mails on JDate, or that I don’t fit in when I roll my fat white ass into the Asian-fusion nightclub. You know why? I know i don’t belong there.

Gunga...

Just let it go…

Walk away…

And while you are up, can you grab me a beer?

In The Beginning…

Posted: April 4, 2012 in Politics, Religion
Tags: , , ,

There were a bunch of tornadoes in Texas yesterday, proving yet again that God hates rednecks. It is hilariously ironic, since people in the south are generally the ones who think “prayer” is an effective defense against twisters, cancer, homosexuality, a hangnail – pretty much anything!

I’ve gotten to the point where cliche religious gestures are met with a level of annoyance. For example, when a loved one is sick you are supposed to say, “Oh, I’ll make sure to pray for them.” All I hear when somebody says that is, “Oh, I’m going to do nothing.” When somebody dies, you are supposed to say, “If there is anything that I can do to help, please do not hesitate to ask.” Of course, nobody ever means that, and nobody ever calls them on it.

“Really? You want to be here for me in my time of need? I was going to paint my house on Saturday, but now I have all of these thank you cards to write for people who came to the funeral. Looks like you can help after all! See you around 10am, and thank you.”

And then... Sand the floor.... in loving memory.

I don’t mind religion. One of the great founding principles of America is that everyone here has the freedom to practice their religion however they see fit. In fact I believe that religion (faith, more specifically) is vital to a vast majority of the people. Some might even say it is a drug – an opiate of sorts.

The 2012 presidential election has called religion to the forefront of the political debate. This is where I get off the train – right when religion stops right at the state station. It shouldn’t stop there… ever.

… But it does. A lot. You can believe what you want, but when it starts affecting legislation (aka it starts affecting ME) your God and I are going to rumble.

Let me try to break it down in a simple manner. Say you want to be president, and you happen to believe that the world is flat. I know, it sounds crazy – but no more crazy than people who believe the Earth is only 6,000 years old – so we’ll use that example. You being an ignorant hillbilly doesn’t bother me at all – Actually it kind of makes me feel good about the fact that I learned how to read. Now, if you want to pass a law based on YOUR factually inaccurate worldview, that is a major issue.

Make sense? If you don’t believe in science that’s fine. When you want to cut education funding, stop teaching evolution, and generally live in some uninformed bubble (and take our children with you) then we have a MAJOR problem.

If you don’t believe in medicine that’s fine. When you want to prevent others from getting health care, birth control, cancer screenings, and generally want people to rely on the “power of prayer” to be healed – again, we’ve got us a MAJOR problem.

If you don’t believe in climate change that’s fine. When you want to slash funding to the National Weather Service, the Environmental Protection Agency, and think that the crazy weather is just some weird random coincidence despite what 99% of scientists say – we have a MAJOR problem.

I’m not trying to make this political: I want this to be about FACTS versus BELIEFS. I believe in God (at least the existence of some form of “higher power”) – but I don’t believe that God gives a shit about women getting cheap birth control. God doesn’t care about gay people getting married because marriage is a function of the STATE, not the church. God should be way too big of a deal to be used as a political pawn.

If religious groups want to get involved in politics, influence policy, lobby members of Congress that is completely their right as a citizen. However, citizens pay taxes. You want to play? You pay.

How quickly do you think we could separate church and state when the church has to start paying to visit?

I took some flak for my take on the Trayvon Martin case. My stance has been that there is an investigation ongoing and while it appears based on reports in the media that George Zimmerman is guilty of a crime, We the People should reserve judgment and let professionals in the local, state, and federal organizations who are conducting the investigation do their thing.

This wouldn't happen if she was in the kitchen where she belongs.

My position is that the media is glorifying and reporting on this story to score ratings, not to report objectively. I talked about media bias, and was immediately labeled as a right-wing redneck (Which again if you know me, is incredibly funny) and a racist.

The column actually got picked up by some other websites, and I was painted as a guy who is racially insensitive because I took the outrageous position that the media is capable of spinning a story to say what they want, and that while the evidence certainly seems stacked against George Zimmerman – He is innocent until proven guilty. I cited obscure documents like the Bill of Rights to strengthen my point.

Here’s the facts: We don’t know the facts. That’s it. We can all speculate and Nancy Grace can come up with really interesting dramatizations about what MIGHT have happened. The FACT is that none of us KNOW. Hell, the police are still trying to figure it out, and despite what a bunch of liberal douchebags with ironic hipster facial hair and too many articles of plaid clothing think – all we are doing is guessing, and your guess is as good as mine.

I’d rather not guess based on a story that is being told to me by the news when it is clear that the news now has an agenda to sell advertising and get ratings moreso than they do an agenda for comprehensive and fair reporting.

Don’t think the media can make you think what they want?

The media transcript:
Little Boy – No, I’m not scared of nothin’!

Reporter – When you get older, you gonna stay away from all these guns?

Little Boy – No, I’m…

Reporter – No?

Little Boy – No.

Reporter – What are you going to do when you get older?

Little Boy – I’m going to have me a gun!

Fade over to a young girl…

After the on-the-scene reporting ends, the morning anchorman remarks earnestly:

Anchorman – That is very scary indeed.

And obviously if you watch the video, you see the FULL story, with convenient editing to take a 4-year old boy who wants to grow up and help fight crime, and make him look like he can’t wait to get his hands on a gun and perpetuate some stereotypical hood violence.

That’s my whole point. We can guess all we want. We can listen to portion of the 911 tapes. We can wonder if that garbled tape is Zimmerman referring to Martin as a “coon” and then as a follow up – is this case racially motivated? Who threw the first punch?

We are all entitled to our opinions. My OPINION is that Zimmerman probably was following Martin, Martin eventually got scared and confronted Zimmerman. Martin may have even thrown the first punch because he was freaked out that some weird dude was following him through the neighborhood. Zimmerman was probably getting hit, and shot Martin not so much in self-defense as much as he was getting his ass kicked. I don’t think it was any premeditated hate crime, although Zimmerman may very well be a racist. My gut is that he will probably go away for 10 years for manslaughter, but the fact that prosecutors haven’t charged Zimmerman yet leads me to believe that they have reasonable doubt as to what to go for more than a question of overall guilt. It’s a complicated case, and while everyone is screaming that Zimmerman should be executed already – it’s still a matter of Due Process. It’s a process, and despite things not going the way you THINK they should go, thankfully the Constitution works for everyone, regardless of personal opinion.


On a sidenote, I want to thank everyone who has been sharing my column on the music industry. It really means a lot to me that I saw a lot of musicians and people who I respect professionally agreeing with my take.